VIAL TRANSFER CART DESIGN:  Designing Transfer Carts for ISO class 5 conditions to meet regulatory requirements including Annex 1 regulations effective May 2010

 

 

 

Hank Rahe

Technical advisor for Containment Technologies Group.

 

 

 

Schaefer Technologies, Inc.

4901 W. Raymond Street

Indianapolis, IN.  46241

 

Phone: 800-435-7174

Email:  kschaefer@schaefertech.us

http://www.schaefer-technologies.net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abstract:

 

This paper addresses that FDA has found several pharmaceutical companies not maintaining ISO class 5 (class A) conditions within transfer carts. Implementing a solution has not been a simple task. The author discusses an approach for designing a transfer cart that will satisfy ISO Class 5 (class A) requirements. 

 

 

 

 

During one FDA inspection, a seemingly simple question brought on a major modification for many parenteral manufacturing operations. Are ISO class 5 (class A) conditions being maintained during the transfer of vials from the filling line to the freeze dryer?

 

What had been the industry norm and practice for many years was suddenly being challenged and most companies did not have the data to answer the offhanded question. Testing was quickly conducted to prove that such a question did not have merit. Surprising to many industry experts, the results showed that ISO class 5 (class A) conditions were not being maintained in the environment where partially stoppered vials were transported. Panic arose on two fronts. The first concern was product integrity and second was finding a solution to the problem. The level of concern was somewhat mitigated by the fact that manufacturers felt that the problem would be relatively simple to correct.

 

However, the design of a new cart has not been a simple task. Many design attempts fail because of the many constraints and variables. A successful design requires unique engineering skills and an understanding of the facility and process.

 

Requirements of a transfer cart

 

Design

 

The design of a new cart requires unidirectional airflow, which has the ability to remove particulate that is generated when the thousands of vials are jarred against one another during movement of the cart and maintain these conditions while the cart is being moved from the filling line to the freeze dryer. Also, fitting the new cart into the existing space proved to be a formidable task.

 

Space

 

Most current parenteral manufacturing facilities are built with a minimal amount of space in the sterile block. Designs are driven by the expense of construction and the cost of maintaining high-–quality spaces. A majority of parenteral manufacturing facilities have filling lines located separately from the freeze dryers within the sterile block. Products that are to be freeze dried, are transported from the filling line to the freeze dryers, through less air–quality zones within the sterile block. At the filling line, products are put into vials that are then partially stoppered and placed onto trays. The trays are then loaded into the transfer carts and transported to the freeze dryer. The carts currently in use are static, in terms of air–handling systems and in most cases are not constructed to be gas tight. Two major design flaws in the transfer cart, currently in use, surfaced when questioned by FDA officials. The first flaw is the lack of an air system that could maintain unidirectional airflow during transport and the second is the lack of integrity in the construction of the cart.

 

Finding a solution

 

The answer was to build a cleanroom on wheels and to incorporate the advantages of an isolator by making the environment gas tight. This solution required complex engineering and an understanding of the human interaction demanded by the process. Several companies attempted to make a cart that would offer a solution, but failed because of a lack of understanding of process interactions. The technical details that had to be considered included were the understanding of the proper airflow velocities, pressurization and patterns to deliver product protection within the carts and the limitations created by the physical facilities. Because the facilities were designed to be as small as possible, the space in the filling line, loading areas and the freeze dryer, ISO class 5 (class A) zones are very limited. These space constraints played a major role in the functional requirements of the new cart design. Time constraints also played a large role because of regulatory demands to get the problem fixed. This meant development of an acceptable solution had to be done quickly.

 

The functional requirements call for an understanding of the space available to load, unload and manipulate the carts. The space constraints include not only the loading and unloading zones, but also the route the carts travel from the filling lines to the freeze dryers, with special concern for turns and door openings. Once the facility constraints are defined, then the size of the transfer cart can be determined. The cart, which consists of the product chamber and support systems, is designed, in most cases, to maximize the number of trays in the product chamber. The larger the product chamber, the more support systems required. Thus, the optimum solution requires a balance of the two variables that maximize the vial load of the cart. Additional considerations include the ergonomics of moving trays loaded with vials, while using proper aseptic techniques during the loading and unloading operations.

The tray–loading area at the end of the filling line typically has ISO class 5 (class A) unidirectional flow coverage provided by hanging, or ceiling HEPA–filtered units. The coverage patterns within these zones change as different objects are placed in this area. The larger cart may change the loading position for the operator which can create different airflow dynamics. Testing for any potential change is critical and should include mapping the area for airflow using a smoke test that is videotaped. Operator technique and proper ergonomics for loading the trays, which weigh more than 10 kg is important. Smoke testing can identify positioning problems. The smoke testing can only be conducted when the sterile block is “down” which limits the amount of time for testing. To compensate for this short window, well designed tests and schedules are required.

 

The unloading of vials at the freeze dryer and reloading after the freeze dry is completed, requires a review of this workstation as well. Videotaping of smoke patterns provides the best documentation that neither the cart nor freeze dryer is compromised during these operations and also provides an operator training tool.

 

The carts operate in the sterile block and must have surfaces that can be cleaned and sanitized which presents a design challenge. The surfaces must be of high quality and designed to eliminate any potential contamination points. From the wheels, to the interior chamber, consideration of good aseptic design for all components was needed.  Testing of materials of construction is important, to assure that they are compatible with the products used for cleaning and sanitizing the cart. The quality in the finish of the surfaces to be cleaned must be considered from two points. First is having a surface finish that can be cleaned to the proper level and the second having a surface finish that can withstand normal activities. The adhesives and gaskets must withstand the harsh chemicals to which they are exposed. The method of application of the cleaning and sanitizing materials should be considered when testing for compatibility. A majority of operations still use manual cleaning and sanitizing of the exterior and interior of the carts. The racks should be removable, since many times they are autoclaved. The design of the rack system is another important feature to consider if it is to be autoclaved, it must fit into an existing autoclave.

 

The gray side mechanical components required for the air handling system are made up of blowers, HEPA filters and a uniform airflow membrane, were also a challenge. The system had exacting performance criteria required to fit into limited space. The system should be tested to assure that the product is maintained within the defined temperature range. Verification of the temperature profile of the cart and the product should also include complete testing of conditions while on battery power. The test protocol should include a profile of both performance and heat load. 

 

While in motion, the carts use a battery-powered system to support the unidirectional airflow systems and controls. Assurance of adequate power to run the air handling system required a control system that monitored battery usage and would sound an alarm in time to place the system on normal AC power, before the product was compromised. The value of the products being transported can range into millions of dollars and any out of specification event would result in the loss of the load.

 

When stationary, the carts use normal power AC power, accomplished by simply plugging the cart into a power source. Planning for adequate staging may require facility modifications because of the number and increased size of the carts. The power sources and energy loads need to be considered. The batteries must be charged, either by an onboard system or at a charging station. Because of the critical area in which the carts operate, the onboard system located in the gray zone of the cart is preferable.

 

A successful design

 

The many constraints and variables described above are just a few examples of why the design of a transfer cart for freeze–dried products is anything but simple and why many design attempts fail. A successful design that will meet regulatory expectations requires unique engineering skills and an understanding of both the facility and the process. To achieve this, the pharmaceutical manufacturer must partner with the cart manufacturer to evaluate the unique nature of the facility and develop the proper solution.

 

SIDEBAR:

CHARACTERISTICS OF A ISO CLASS 5 CART

¨      Gas tight environment.

¨      Proper space availability to load, unload, and manipulate.

¨      Well-designed smoke test.

¨      High quality, cleaned surface.

¨      Good aseptic design.

¨      Removable racks.

¨      Monitored battery usage.

 

Back

 

 

Copyright © 2011 Schaefer Technologies Inc. All Rights reserved.